The Series You HAVE TO Watch!

 

          GOOD DAY, my dear readers! Today I wanted to post this brief article in order to promote a series of videos that I’ve followed for a few months now. It is very eye-opening and has served as a major inspiration for my understanding of deep politics, world history, the future, and all sorts of things. It is just that mind-blowing and encompassing.

          This is the Third Adam documentary that has been in production since early-2020 by Spencer Smith, a Baptist minister from Kentucky. This series has three parts, Third Adam 1, 2, and 3 – 3 has an extended version, 3X, that runs for four hours. The several hours of overall footage contained within this series is positively unforgettable because it shows how thousands of years of history ultimately comes down to an eternal struggle between two forces: Christianity and the “Mystery” religion. I discuss this idea partially in some of my articles, most prominently in “Origins of Abortion”, where I begin a historical analysis that begins in Babylon.

However, I believe this also shows up in the Liberty v. Power motif that was popularized by Rothbard, because if you read books such as Larry Siedentop’s Inventing the Individual and War, Christianity and the State by Laurence Vance you can see that Christianity significantly contributed to the rise of individualism and [classical] liberalism, individualism and liberalism being considered by Rothbard to be the greatest elements of Liberty. Christianity, then, represents one side of the eternal battle in the political realm, while Spencer Smith’s documentaries examines the eternal battle in the spiritual realm.

It is simply very, highly valuable that you take the time out of your life over the course of, say, a week to get through this series and take in all its claims. While it might be a bit hard to believe at points it is overall solidly grounded in history, it just discusses history you were never taught in school. It will help you understand how the rising one-world government requires and will have its one-world religion.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Conquest's Second Law and Libertarianism

  IN political science there is a concept known as “Conquest’s laws of politics.” It is named after Robert Conquest, a conservative British historian best known for his books on the Soviet Union . Similar to Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics,” Conquest’s laws define three principles of political action that can be considered reliably accurate. These three laws are: Everyone is conservative about what he knows best. Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing. The simplest way to explain the behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume that is controlled by a cabal of its enemies. All these laws have interesting implications and can be looked at one by one. However, today the one law that I want us to focus on in particular is the second law, that, “Any organization not explicitly right-wing sooner or later becomes left-wing.” It certainly sounds interesting and can have broad implications for political strategy. For libertarians in part
Read more

Active Measures: Part I, "Demoralization"

  This is the first of a planned three-part series that will focus on analyzing the origins, perpetrators, and fulfillment of Soviet-style subversive “active measures” in the United States and elsewhere in the West. Because of the amount of information that there is to talk about, owing to the enormity of data that is revealed through thorough research of this subject, this multi-volume approach has been taken. This first installment is focused on the strategy of “demoralization”.             BACK in the 1980s a now-infamous interview was hosted by George E. Griffin with KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov. This interview, little known to the general public, exposed the four-part strategy by which the Soviet KGB sought to subvert enemy nations. Many commentators, especially in recent years, have noted that these “active measures” that Bezmenov exposed are highly reminiscent of situations happening in contemporary society. Along with George Orwell’s Nineteen-Eighty-Four , Bezmenov’s revelat
Read more

Divide and Conquer

THE  political situation in America is pretty awful, and has been for probably up to a decade (although, I’d argue it has always been bad, and has only become obvious in recent years). Every month, every week, every day even, we must watch on in an ashamed stupor as the assembly of people elected to direct with steadfast loyalty our country act like toddlers left alone in a classroom. A simply net positive GDP growth means nothing, because the cogs of the machine have grown greasy and old. As a great exhibit of the condition of our country, recent statistics show a very legitimate desire for secession among certain Americans. This is not good, it is as simple as that. Every nation-state, every civil society, is a human experiment. Locke, who I oft differ to, saw civil society as the consensual assembly of humans under common principles (Locke 2015, p. 77). The State, therefore, is consequently obliged to be sensitive of and accommodating to the human condition; not sensitive or acco
Read more